A simple comparison between truck and train

What do we know about the technical specifications of the included vehicles? It is very difficult to get relevant parameters for the electric truck and it is a shame because that makes the comparison lame.

A comparison between the included vehicles

Electric Truck VNR 6x2 tractor USA








We have taken the data from the American market: 
Truck with trailer has a permissible gross train weight of 80,000 lbs, which corresponds to approximately 37.2 tons. 
Gross vehicle weight of the truck tractor 16.5 tons or more. 
Trailer has a net weight of approximately 4 tons. 
Remaining payload 37.2 - 16.5 -4 = 12.7 tons. 
Range 440 km. 
Charging 60 minutes to 80% of battery capacity.


Railway, container wagon








A container wagon has the capacity as below: 
Sdggmrss (TWIN) is a connected wagon with space for 2 40 ft containers Dead weight 35 tons for the comparison 1/2 wagon To be compared 17.5 tons per half unit 
Dead weight for a 40 ft container 3,800 kg Load capacity: 
fully loaded 40 ft container 30,480 Kg Payload capacity 26.68 tons 
Range unlimited No loading required 

A comparison between electric trucks and trains

Without doing an in-depth analysis, a simple comparison can show the difference in design and transport capacities. 

Transport volume 300 tons From Malmö to Stockholm, distance for simplicity the same 615 km 
Design speed 80 km/h for both modes of transport

Note.

Just with this simple overview calculation, it can be concluded that all goods should be transported by rail. Nothing else is relevant if we are to take care of the environment and also reduce energy costs. If we add to the calculations that it is 30 - 40 times more expensive to move things by road if we only consider energy costs. If we then add investment costs for the respective vehicles, it becomes even more obvious. Truck transport has reached the end of the road and only belongs in shorter distribution operations.