Future intermodal transport
With future intermodal transport, you can really reduce transport costs and increase the use of the railway in an efficient way. There is no more efficient way to transport than the railway. But then you have to start thinking new and not be stuck in the old system that doesn't work at all. The big problem that has been pointed out is the terminals. We have to reduce acceptable prices to move a unit load between the modes of transport truck and rail. Think new, think again!
1. Then you get a requirement that must apply: Cheap, simple terminals that can be established in many places
2. The terminal technology should be able to scale up and down according to the current need! This makes it possible for the terminal design to follow the needs of the market.
3. Simple, inexpensive unit loads that are standardized and can be handled by all modes of transport
4. The terminal must be able to operate with 0 CO2 emissions
According to the EU, 75% of today's road transport should be shifted to rail or sea transport. Furthermore, the EU wants to ban truck transport longer than 300 km. Then the EU says that there should be terminals where there are more than 100,000 inhabitants. All in all, we have to build many terminals to meet the EU's requirements.
With today's technology and transportation, this will not work! We will not be able to meet the EU's goals.
It is important to find solutions to the problems and it is important to be radical and allow for sweeping changes and not get stuck in the old patterns.
We would go as far as banning truck transport over 150 km and an absolute requirement that the distribution cars used should be 0 emissions in terms of CO2.
Through this radical change in terminals and the execution of transports, other radical changes can be implemented and with a dense terminal location, rail transport can be carried out in line traffic and not as today in end-point traffic. Much more goods will be interesting for rail transports.
With a maximum distance of 150 km between the terminals, it will only be interesting to have distribution trucks that can handle the last part of the transport to and from customers. The distribution trucks must belong to the respective terminal. Transport with truck crews of 20 to 34.5 meters in length is completely uninteresting and will be out-competed by our automatic handling system. What remains is a dense terminal structure with rail transport between the terminals and a short distribution of zero-emission vehicles between terminals and customers.
An organization that is suitable to take care of terminal operations is the local LBCs that are found in many locations. They have local knowledge and are active in what would be each terminal's operational area. The drivers stay in the area and there is a natural connection to the operations.
What will remain on the vehicle side are vehicles that can transport containers from 10 feet to 45 feet. Since the terminals are closely spaced, the vehicles can be electric and this gives a 0 CO2 emission. This means that all transport within the system will be carried out without CO2 emissions, which will really affect our environment.
The result is that we have an infrastructure that is efficient and transports take place at low costs and completely without CO2 emissions. The dense terminal location means that the service level has been significantly increased for all consumers and suppliers. The system is also adapted for the future and we will not see a lot of companies leaving Sweden due to very poor and high logistics costs. The dense terminal location also enables the WHOLE COUNTRY TO LIVE!
Other positive features are that all drivers can stay at home and only carry out distribution runs. No runs are longer than 150 km. Competition from foreign drivers is also gone as it is not profitable to go to Sweden just to drive distribution routes. We have a completely different human transport structure.
We are already being left behind by the rest of Europe and we will find it difficult in Sweden to maintain our industry and to attract new investments and establishments. We simply have a completely poorly built infrastructure that will suffer from large and high transport costs in comparison to the rest of Europe. Sweden will not be a future country for industry and investments.
This site was created with the Nicepage